Thursday, January 27, 2005

Tort Case? Crim Law? Both? Again, like the one below, this could go either way. Was the TV station negligent for giving a false-warning of an impending nuclear attack? If so, does comparative negligence come into play here? Homicide? Certainly looks like "... killing of another human being with malice aforethought..." Then again - maybe it's really a products liability issue. Things aren't always what they appear to be. I say this guy has a case against both the TV station as well as the gun manufacturer. Oh - and the dead woman - definitely got loads of Tort action going on there as well. Uh oh - but this guys comments point to an mens rea "intent" element. Hmm. Not good. Not good. This might be murder. Damn. No money in this one. Ok, move on.
Posted by Hello


Post a Comment

<< Home